People & mission
Whom a program prepares physicians to serve, and whether that purpose invites sustained commitment.
Interactive project
An interactive tool I built with AI to compare 73 programs by mission, training, place, and two-career family fit—and to record why each deserved a closer look.
How I used AI. AI helped normalize the working list, surface themes, prototype the interface, and draft first-pass summaries from my notes. I verified every entry; my wife and I set the criteria and made the decisions. Method and disclosure ↓
73 programs · 59 MD · 14 DO
Search or select a program to read the family, vocational, or service rationale that put it on the map.
Inclusion is not a ranking, endorsement, or application decision.
Loading programs.
| Program | Degree | Location |
|---|
The searchable table provides the same program and location information without requiring the map.
We defined the human constraints first—service, clinical training, community, cost, support, and two-career sustainability—then used the map to make tradeoffs visible.
AI helped organize the dataset, surface comparisons, prototype the interface, and reconstruct first-draft rationales from my notes and prior conversations. I reviewed every rationale for accuracy and kept only language I could personally defend.
This public version omits private scores, rankings, tactical notes, and final decisions. The notes do not say whether I applied, how I ranked a program, or what another applicant should do.
Whom a program prepares physicians to serve, and whether that purpose invites sustained commitment.
Clinical exposure, mentorship, and whether engineering habits could become useful at the bedside.
Whether my wife could sustain a serious aerospace and automotive engineering career while I trained.
Community, support, cost, housing, travel, and the ordinary logistics that make a plan livable.
The tool did not eliminate uncertainty. It made the uncertainty discussable.